Molecular Photophysics AI

Seven optical properties from SMILES in seconds.

TD-DFT takes 24 to 72 hours per molecule, so millions of virtual candidates get narrowed to a few hundred that anyone actually evaluates. Our graph isomorphism network predicts absorption, emission, bandwidths, extinction, quantum yield, and lifetime straight from a SMILES string.

R² 0.946Absorption max, n=1,771
1000×Faster than TD-DFT
<1 secPer molecule, per property

Predicted in PBS, DMSO, ACN/water, ethanol, and hexane. Solvent-conditioned GIN, because the same molecule behaves differently in two buffers.

Absorption max486 nm
Quantum yield0.71

The problem

Every molecule's optical behaviour is a question quantum chemistry answers slowly.

Before anyone synthesises a candidate, someone needs to know how it absorbs, emits, and decays. Today that means TD-DFT. It is accurate, and slow enough that only a sliver of any real virtual library ever gets checked. The rest is guesswork, or it never gets screened at all.

Time to compute one molecule with TD-DFT24 to 72 hrs
Typical virtual library size for a real screening programmeMillions
Of those, the number evaluated before synthesisA few hundred

Try the model

Pick a molecule. Watch the properties land.

The preview below is scripted, using four reference fluorophores. The production model accepts any valid SMILES string. Try the model for live predictions.

Reference molecules
CCN(CC)c1ccc2cc3c(cc2c1)oc1cc(=O)ccc1c3-c1ccccc1
Abs max (λabs)
Ready
Em max (λem)
Ready
Abs FWHM
Ready
Em FWHM
Ready
log ε
Ready
Quantum yield
Ready
Lifetime (τ)
Ready
Status
Ready
Scripted preview: Ready
GIN · trained on 20,796 chromophore-solvent points

How it fits your workflow

We don't replace TD-DFT. We decide what's worth running it on.

A two-stage pipeline: cheap, fast pre-screening across the full virtual library, then TD-DFT validation only on the candidates that clear the bar.

01 · MILLIONS

GIN pre-screen

SMILES in, seven properties out, in under a second per molecule. Rank a virtual library that would take decades to touch with TD-DFT.

~0.4s / molecule, CPU
02 · HUNDREDS

TD-DFT validation

Spend your quantum-chemistry budget on the survivors. Complementary to the tools you already run, not a replacement for them.

24 to 72 hrs / molecule
03 · TOP 5 TO 10

Synthesise

At $5K to $20K and weeks of lab time per candidate, the cost of the pipeline is decided long before anyone touches a flask.

Weeks / candidate

Test-set performance

Accuracy, property by property.

Held-out R² across all seven predicted properties, with 697 to 1,850 test measurements per property. We publish all seven, not just the best ones.

Abs max
0.946
n = 1,771
Em max
0.896
n = 1,850
Abs FWHM
0.824
n = 697
Em FWHM
0.775
n = 1,139
log ε
0.811
extinction coefficient
log Φ
0.705
quantum yield
log τ
0.766
excited-state lifetime
Inference
<1 sec
per molecule, per property

From predictions to decisions

Seven numbers. One verdict.

Every prediction is classified against thresholds you set for your own use case. Turn seven predicted properties into one flag your bench team can act on.

GOAll target properties inside your acceptance window
MARGINALOne property close to the edge. Worth a second look before you commit
STOPBelow your threshold. Save the synthesis budget for stronger candidates

Four workflows, four buyers

One model, four ways in.

Different molecules, same problem: optical properties gate every downstream decision, and today they're found out too late.

API Analytical Method Planning

For QC and analytical chemistry heads at CDMOs and generics companies.

Plan UV detector wavelength and concentration range from one SMILES string at project intake, before synthesis. Cut the 2 to 4 week post-synthesis delay on every new API.

R² 0.946 absorption max · R² 0.811 extinction coefficient

Fluorescent Assay Reporter Dye Selection

For assay development teams at CROs, biotechs, and vaccine manufacturers.

Pre-screen a whole dye catalogue in minutes. Match emission, quantum yield, and lifetime to your plate-reader filter set and assay format before any procurement.

R² 0.896 emission · R² 0.705 quantum yield · R² 0.766 lifetime

OLED / TADF Emitter Screening

For display materials R&D at emitter developers and panel makers.

Rank candidates by colour gamut, quantum yield, and lifetime in the microsecond TADF window, simultaneously. Screen 100 candidates in roughly 100 seconds, before committing to synthesis.

Four properties, one rank. Screen before synthesis.

ADC Payload DAR Analytics

For conjugate development teams at pharma and biotechs.

Predict payload extinction coefficient and payload-specific max wavelength before HPAPI synthesis. The inputs every DAR calculation needs, ready before the first conjugation.

R² 0.946 absorption · R² 0.811 extinction · R² 0.896 emission
27Validated use cases
15+Industries identified
4Where we're focused first

The model predicts universal photophysical properties. Any industry that needs to know how a molecule absorbs, emits, or decays is a structural fit. These four are where we've chosen to go first. The list of validated use cases is growing every quarter.

SMILES in, predictions out

Start free. Scale when it earns its keep.

Explorer

Free

$0 / month
  • 100 predictions / month
  • Single SMILES input
  • Community support
Start free
Enterprise

Custom

  • Unlimited predictions
  • On-premise option
  • Custom fine-tuning
  • Dedicated support
Talk to us

Bring us your hardest scaffold.

Blind Retrospective Validation: send us 20 molecules you've already measured, whether shelved, historical, or non-active. We predict all seven properties blind. You compare against your own records.

5Working days to your accuracy report
No NDARequired for non-active compounds
$0Whether we match or miss, you keep the report

Direct to the founders. No procurement, no IT onboarding.

Who we are

Founded on the science. Here to prove it.

UAE · India · Global Customers

Data policy

Your molecules are your IP. Contact the founders to discuss data-handling terms for your specific engagement.

The architecture

Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN), as powerful as the Weisfeiler-Lehman test for distinguishing molecular graph structure. Trained on 20,796 experimental chromophore-solvent measurement points rather than TD-DFT theoretical data.